Trump And T-Mobile Quid Pro Quo
Some House Democrats See Through The Hustle, And So Do I
Quid Pro Quo
When Trump Mobile was announced, I couldn’t figure out what network it was using but the coverage map looked like T-Mobile’s, this letter from the committee is gonna expose it.
The committee is specifically questioning if President Trump and T-Mobile had a quid pro quo related to a Spectrum Agreement in the Big Beautiful Bill.
This committee is specific to the “jurisdiction on spectrum policy”.
Spectrum is the invisible airwaves that our wireless networks flow across and it’s the most important asset for a wireless carrier. T-Mobile, AT&T, and Verizon are the only three wireless networks in the USA, all of the other carriers are using one of those three networks to run their MVNO (Mobile Virtual Network Operator).
The committee should also be questioning Trump’s FCC approving two multi-billion dollar acquisitions after T-Mobile pretended to drop DEI two weeks ago, but my guess is that question is out of scope for this committee.
Another key point that makes this letter more interesting - the same FCC approved T-Mobile purchasing Sprint in 2019 which teed up all of this to happen.
Summarizing The Letter
I’ll summarize the letter and share direct quotes because they are making some very bold statements, the sentences in quotations are directly from the letter.
Democrats in the House of Representatives Committee on Energy And Commerce have strong reservations with T-Mobile’s involvement with Trump Mobile as it poses a significant conflict of interest between T-Mobile and the executive branch.
Trump’s current Chairman of the Federal Communications Commission is Brenden Carr and he served in Trump’s first administration - “It has been well documented that the current Chair, Brendan Carr, has used his position to advance the interests of the President, often in conflict with the law.”
“T-Mobile is in an especially favorable and potentially anticompetitive position relative to its competitors” - this statement makes even more sense when you rewind to Trump’s first administration, when they approved T-Mobile purchasing Sprint which teed up T-Mobile to have the most advanced 5G network in the world.
Questions from the committee:
I’m pasting directly from the letter so it’s a little repetitive, answers are due by August 6, 2025.
Dear Mr. Sievert:
Did you or any employee of T-Mobile have any communications with President Trump, anyone representing the White House, or anyone representing the Trump Organization about Trump Mobile beginning on January 20, 2025, through the present time? If so, please provide a copy of any such written communications and for any verbal communications, please provide the date, time, and a description of what was discussed.
Did you or any employee of T-Mobile have any communications with President Trump, anyone representing the White House, or anyone representing the Trump Organization about U.S. spectrum policy and/or the spectrum agreement in either the House or Senate reconciliation bills beginning from January 20, 2025, until the present time? If so, please provide a copy of any written communications and for any verbal communications,
please provide the date, time, and a description of what was discussed.
Does T-Mobile maintain an MVNO agreement with Liberty Mobile? If so, does this agreement allow Liberty Mobile to subdelegate its MVNO agreement with other entities, such as the Trump Organization and/or Trump Mobile? If Liberty Mobile is allowed to sub-delegate its MVNO agreement with T-Mobile, please summarize the terms under which it is allowed to do so, the type of notice that must be provided to T-Mobile, and any payment or consideration due to T-Mobile for doing so.
Does T-Mobile maintain an MVNO agreement with Ultra Mobile? If so, does this
agreement allow Ultra Mobile to subdelegate its MVNO agreement with other entities, such as the Trump Organization and/or Trump Mobile? If Ultra Mobile is allowed to subdelegate its MVNO agreement with T-Mobile, please summarize the terms under which it is allowed to do so, the type of notice that must be provided to T-Mobile, and any payment or consideration due to T-Mobile for doing so.
Does T-Mobile maintain an MVNO agreement with the Trump Organization and/or Trump Mobile? If so, please summarize the terms of agreement and detail how much money the Trump Organization and/or Trump Mobile will pay T-Mobile annually for this arrangement. If T-Mobile does not maintain an MVNO agreement with the Trump Organization or Trump Mobile, will T-Mobile receive any payment from the Trump Organization or Trump Mobile for its wireless service offering? If so, please identify how much money T-Mobile will receive on an annual basis from the Trump Organization and/or Trump Mobile for its wireless service offering?
My Life Is A Movie
I reached out to the committee to see if they’re interested in hearing from the T-Mobile Whistleblower.
I’ve documented one hell of a story over the last two years and I refuse to give up because I know I’m doing the right thing and my integrity and passion helps me be resilient.
I’m one of the biggest stories in America that is being suppressed, I’m censored into barely existing, and I’ve documented all of it in a breadcrumb trail for anyone to read.
I exposed T-Mobile’s merger lies in my T-Mobile expose back in December 2023, I exposed how their DEI practices divided America from within, and I shared my first hand experience of dedicating 17 years of my life to a company that ended up violating my Constitutional Rights for being unvaccinated.
And since my first expose, I’ve published 115 T-Mobile stories on my Substack and made countless videos on Instagram and YouTube.
If you’re reading this, thank you for following me and my story!
With Love - Marc Palasciano
T-Mobile Employee P12434408
As a reminder, I turned down my $150k severance so I could speak up about T-Mobile.
Official Letter
Recent Videos
Here’s the BodyCam footage from being Criminally Trespassed at the PGA - notice I never stepped foot onto PGA property, the PGA officials didn’t say one word to me, and nobody asked me to leave before citing me with an official Criminal Trespass Warning.
This is what Authoritarianism looks like in the United States of America.
T-Mobile Former Employee P12434408
There fixed it.
Apart from conflicts of interest, do any of these people, Democrat or Republican, make an issue of the fact that T-Mobile is own by a foreign, hence potentially hostile (maybe in fact hostile), government? An issue was indeed made of T-Mobile's ownership when it first was allowed to enter the US market decades ago, and the US was given assurances that the company was going to be fully privatized and the German govt would divest its shares. But T-Mobile is a division of Deutsche Telekom, and the German government is STILL the principal shareholder in Deutsche Telekom with fully 28% of its shares as of this writing. It's just amazing that no one ever talks about it. Just from the point of view of fair competition, this is obviously inacceptable. To say nothing of national security.